ja_mageia

About Us

We help online media companies identify and increase their share of local online advertising revenue through fact-based research, proprietary data, consulting and comprehensive sales training

Sign Up

Newspapers’ Pendulum Swing

July 28th, 2010 by Kip Cassino

I love newspapers. I worked in the industry for decades, but before that, I grew up reading them. My grandfather and my father before me read the paper every day. My day still begins with newspapers and breakfast. And like nearly three-fourths of all adults in this country, I read my local community newspaper every week.

While newspapers have fallen on hard times over the past decade, the industry is finally showing signs of emerging from the deep trough it tumbled into, a pit largely dug by the newspapers themselves. In a few weeks we will revisit our forecast from 12 months ago that newspaper ad revenues would bounce back, showing an average annual increase of approximately 1.7% over the ensuing five years but perhaps never again reaching the $40 billion they achieved in 2008. I suspect we’ll adjust the forecast, but not by much. A mild bounce-back is inevitable.

Back in the early ’90s, before the Internet realigned everybody’s perceptions of media, newspapers were coming out of another earnings slump — albeit a far more shallow pit than the one they currently endure. The men who ran the big, multi-city metro chains decided that the best way to court Wall Street was with steadily climbing margins. They worked hard at the strategy, pulling newspaper company profit margins from an average of ten to 12 percent to beyond 20 percent by the end of the century. The process was tough. Newspapers were laying off people and ending careers all through the good times of the ’90s, long before their primary advertising franchises became in doubt.

By the late ’90′s newspaper classifieds started to erode. First, recruitment spending went to the Web, as employers discovered they could do for themselves what the liner ads in the back of the paper had always done before. Next, department store spending bled away, as the big chain stores hit cost and competition walls. Later on, real estate discovered the Web as well, and that long-held franchise began to drift away.

In reality, all of these major components of newspaper advertising had been eroding for years. But in a hot economy, loss of share may not be noticed as long as receipts continue to climb — especially if you don’t measure share, just year-over-year change in sales. The strategy of increasing price where sales were good, then meeting with major advertisers to mediate the increase had always worked for newspapers. Everybody thought it would work forever. However, the strategy could only work in a world where no new media competitors — especially competitors that could compete in the classified arena — existed. Once the Internet was monetized, the old ways no longer applied.

Now, as the newspaper industry pulls itself back to black ink, it finds itself in a new world. Here are some of the new rules:

  • Content is still king (but not newswire content). Anybody with a computer or a smart phone can find 50 free sources for AP or Reuters content. They don’t need a newspaper (in any form) for that. On the other hand, Local news isn’t as commoditized. It tends to be scratched and suffered out of the community by actual reporters (or even by readers). It is the more valuable content for newspapers.
  • Ads are content, too. More than one-third of the people who use their computers or read a paper are employing those media to help them look for items to buy, things to do, or places to go. On Sundays, nearly half of the people who buy the newspaper are doing so for the advertising content.
  • Advertisers want measurement. They’re no longer satisfied being told that an ad will reach a lot of people – unless they can see the results in their places of business.

The last point is probably the most important. The marketing pendulum is swinging away from advertising, toward promotions. Unlike ads, promotions are very measurable, and they can be launched on an advertiser’s own website or Facebook page.

Can newspapers find a place in this new world, someplace between the pit and the pendulum? Some smaller papers, community and suburban offerings for the most part, continue to do well. It’s the big metro dailies that have been hit hardest and seem the slowest to recover. It is too soon to forecast how and in what form they will continue.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

USPS paints Social Networking as a big fat ruse

July 9th, 2010 by Kip Cassino

Social media chart.A publication passed across my desk today. It’s called Deliver, a slick business magazine published by the U.S. Postal Service. Even though I didn’t order it, the magazine was addressed to me. Such are the wonders of direct mail.

Part of the magazine’s content decried social network marketing. One column begins, “The real danger with social media is in marketers expecting too much from it.”  Another begins, “Social media takes up more time than it does money.”   But the coup de grace is the back page.  It features a full-page “Last Word > Found in the Trash” piece showing a crumpled piece of paper with a chart labeled “Percent of Adults Who Use Social Media, 2005-2009.” Above the chart, a nameless executive has written “Why are we paying so much attention to this if HALF the population isn’t?” The scribbled answer: ” ’Cause it’s the cool new thing.”

There’s nothing wrong with a media choice or outlet defending itself, or seeking to increase its validity at the expense of competition. However, there is something very odd about a quasi-governmental organization that may lose $5 billion this year spending public money to bash the wrong competitor. (Yes, that’s billion with a B.)

The Postal Service doesn’t need more direct mail. Nor do consumers. Direct mail of all sorts already makes up more than half of all the items delivered to our mailboxes every day. What the Postal Service needs — desperately — is more personal mail, the letters you and I used to send each other before long distance calls got so cheap and e-mail became so ubiquitous.

Sadly for your postman, a return to the personal mail levels of the 1980s or even the 1990s is highly unlikely. Without that kind of volume, the Postal Service will be unable to continue its Faustian bargain with the nation’s large direct mailers. The facts are simple. Even though direct mail makes up an increasing share of postal volume, its share of postal revenue sits at about 20 percent. That old Vaudeville line, “I lose a buck on every sale, but I make it up in volume!” applies here with a vengeance.

For decades the imbalance didn’t seem to matter, as long as the deep discounts given to direct mailers could be offset by stable amounts of personal mail. Now, everybody involved will have to pay more and get less. To make a bad situation even worse, the Postal Service has pension overhang as bad as any Detroit automaker ever endured. The agreement pushed through Congress in 1993 might have brought relief, if e-mail had never been discovered.

What is needed now is a bitter dose of reality — not a slick magazine. We will always need a postal service. But we need a service that serves the people of this nation, not businesses grown used to unsupportable discounts. “Deliver” should be mantra of this service, not the title of a marketing campaign.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

The value in mobile advertising

June 22nd, 2010 by guest

When you’re all consumed with growing a new business like mobile advertising and the positive examples of ROI are measured in handfuls, how do you know if you’ve gotten it right?  On Friday afternoon, I found an Interactive Director that was completely unaware that his story was outstanding by any measure. With an attitude like that, these early wins will just be the tip of an iceberg for him and his station.

Sandy Martin

Sandy Martin, BAI Marketing Analyst

In May, he ran an annual campaign that was promoted on-air, online and on mobile devices. The station gave away an umbrella a day, every day, for the month of May. They started the campaign 15 years ago with entries via post card.  Post cards were followed a few years later by online entries which were now followed by SMS entries.  While they received almost 9,000 Web entries, this year they also included a text call-to-action in their promotions and received 4,342 unique entries via mobile phone. I was impressed enough with the 4,342 responses. But, dare I ask? Did he make any money? Yes.  $26,000.

Now, I’m pretty nerdy, so when I think about 4,342 entries, I think of databasing and the ability to remarket.  This Interactive Director, on the other hand, saw the campaign as an opportunity for the advertiser to reach an engaged audience, and the entries represented proof of engagement.  Remarketing to a list never came up in the sale.

So, I ask you, what are you doing in your market to demonstrate that you have an engaged audience for your advertisers? How can you use mobile advertising, the most personal of all media, to increase brand recall and call-to-action on behalf of your clients?

Mobile couponing comes up a lot because it’s easy to do with text messaging. While it may be effective, it offers a weak revenue opportunity when compared to the example above. It wouldn’t take long to get 500 to 1,000 people to subscribe to SMS alerts from a neighborhood pizza joint. Then what? The restaurant pays to remarket to the list again and again? That’s a commodity strategy for the media company and a discounting strategy for the restaurant. In neither case is it very profitable.

I just redeemed my first mobile coupon for a free personal organic cheese pizza this week. In fact, I nearly leapt across the table to seize the alternative weekly my friend was reading when I saw the text “FUSION” call to action out of the corner of my eye as he turned the page. Who doesn’t love pizza coupons? There are 14 pizza places within two miles of my house. I have a stack of pizza coupons in a drawer in my kitchen, but I’ve ordered pizza twice this week and only used one coupon. I prefer Pizza Fusion, coupon or not. That’s branding in action, and, against my better judgment, I’m a profitable customer.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn