ja_mageia

About Us

We help online media companies identify and increase their share of local online advertising revenue through fact-based research, proprietary data, consulting and comprehensive sales training

Sign Up

Archive for the ‘Marketing’ Category

Breaking news! It’s…a Deal!

Wednesday, August 25th, 2010

Adolph Ochs The euphoric rush toward deal-of-the day programs reminds me of a quote from Adolph Ochs of The New York Times:  “Advertising in the final analysis should be news.  If it is not news, it is worthless.”

While newspapers and TV stations rush to put more “news” online, I fear that they’re missing the bigger opportunity on the Internet – one that companies like Groupon and Living Social are stealing away.   The more important local content in the lean-forward medium of the Internet is advertising, not “news” in the traditional sense.  Perhaps that’s behind the latest rush of yellow pages companies to make their print directory business more “newsworthy.”

The latest is Yellowbook, the entrepreneurial yellow pages company that this week announced the launch of Weforia (www.weforia.com). Its initial deals are limited to Boston, Fort Myers and Phoenix, but the early sales results prior to the Sept. 25th launch portend a rapid rollout in other cities. While I was on the phone with Mike Wilson, vice president of digital media and general manager of Yellowbook.com, he kept receiving email notices of more sales for Weforia.

(We’ll explore these deals further during our Local Mobile Advertising Conference Sept. 27-29 in Dallas. Would love to see you there.)

The yellow pages have a natural advantage. Yellowbook has 1,000 directories and tentacles into hundreds of thousands of small businesses. So do companies like AT&T, Supermedia, Dex and others. The deal-of-the day program adds currency to the static offering of the printed directory and allows them to compete directly with the “news”.

“Yellowbook’s goal is to provide small businesses with multiple ways to reach local customers,” Wilson said. “A consumer-facing website like Weforia.com, built to showcase special, local limited-time deals from our clients, is a natural extension to our current portfolio.” In addition to Weforia.com, merchant group offers will be promoted on Yellowbook.com, Yellowbook’s suite of Mobile Apps (including Android, iPhone and iPad, among others) and across its wide network of partners.

At Borrell Associates, the phone has been ringing off the hook and emails have been rolling in from clients launching group-buying deals like Groupon and Living Social. We’ve heard amazing results – like one media company launching a program that, after three months, is already on a track to generate $1 million in net revenue this year. On very, very little expense.

It’s the new-new thing, and the results are certainly encouraging – even exciting. In the end, companies like Yellowbook, I think, will have learned the secret of “local media” that Adolph Ochs was talking about.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

The Mobile Marketing Backlash

Thursday, August 12th, 2010

I visited a newspaper manager last month and asked what he was doing in the mobile space.  “We’re doing what you recommended,” he said.”Nothing.”

Hmm.  I did say last year that mobile presented “a great opportunity for media companies to lose money.”  But I’m not sure that “nothing” is the appropriate strategy for a medium that will attract more local ad dollars than radio, yellow pages, direct mail or outdoor advertising within five years.

Truth be known, the newspaper manager was actually doing something.  He had launched an app and was delivering news over mobile devices.  But the company was devoting scant resources to sell the app or to work on anything else in the mobile space, like text coupons or location-based advertising.

So is that the appropriate strategy?  You’d think so if you’d seen what I’ve seen in the past two months.  Conference speakers get blank stares when they act like Chicken Little citing statistics about the growth of mobile advertising.  They get laughter and even applause when they do their Eeyore imitation bemoaning how overrated it all seems.

Case in point:  At a conference of major retailers in Chicago a few weeks ago, the founder and CEO of eMarketer took the stage and was far more energetic than his unresponsive audience.  His liveliness and jokes fell flat.  But he found a sweet spot when he started debunking the numbers for mobile advertising and social media.  He showed the wide range of forecasts being offered and commented, “I’m not sure where they’re getting these numbers.”  Chuckles and nodding.   When he showed research demonstrating how miniscule or overrated certain audiences were, the audience remained engaged.

Another case in point:  At a state broadcasting convention last month, the audience laughed and applauded when the president of Emmis Communications bashed social media and the phenomenon of people glued to Droids and iPods.

A final case in point:  Ten people emailed me an Advertising Age article headlined, “Forrester:  Why Most Marketers Should Forgo Foursquare.”  One of the comments on the Ad Age article observes:  “Wow – for once, Forrester isn’t riding the social media bandwagon and it gets taken to the woodshed by the commenters.”

The backlash for mobile marketing has begun.  I suspect it will intensify in the coming months as legacy media like TV, radio and newspapers start showing gains, as is typically the case when we climb out of  a deep recession.   Our forecasts at Borrell Associates show newspapers with annual revenue gains of 1.6% over the next five years, TV with gains of 3.6% and radio pretty much flat. The fact that newspapers and broadcast media aren’t dead is “news,” which means that all this stuff about new media killing old media must be hogwash.

So what does all this mean?   Timing is very important.   We are approaching the tail end of an extended period of hype for mobile marketing.  People are rushing in by the thousands with apps and features and software and all sorts of gimmicks, citing statistics (like Borrell Associates’) to gain credibility.  That bubble is about to burst, and mobile-bashing will become vogue, similar to what happened in the aftermath of the dotcom bubble burst.

That’s why we’ve pulled together a Local Mobile Advertising Conference next month in Dallas.  The agenda is devoid of people who have something to sell and includes only the key front-line strategists in the mobile space.  We’ve filtered out the hype and plan to get down to brass tacks.  What’s working, and what’s merely interesting but yields no results?

For media companies, successfully tackling the mobile space will depend not on rushing in with everything you’ve got, but knowing when to rush in with the appropriate effort.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Newspapers’ Pendulum Swing

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

I love newspapers. I worked in the industry for decades, but before that, I grew up reading them. My grandfather and my father before me read the paper every day. My day still begins with newspapers and breakfast. And like nearly three-fourths of all adults in this country, I read my local community newspaper every week.

While newspapers have fallen on hard times over the past decade, the industry is finally showing signs of emerging from the deep trough it tumbled into, a pit largely dug by the newspapers themselves. In a few weeks we will revisit our forecast from 12 months ago that newspaper ad revenues would bounce back, showing an average annual increase of approximately 1.7% over the ensuing five years but perhaps never again reaching the $40 billion they achieved in 2008. I suspect we’ll adjust the forecast, but not by much. A mild bounce-back is inevitable.

Back in the early ’90s, before the Internet realigned everybody’s perceptions of media, newspapers were coming out of another earnings slump — albeit a far more shallow pit than the one they currently endure. The men who ran the big, multi-city metro chains decided that the best way to court Wall Street was with steadily climbing margins. They worked hard at the strategy, pulling newspaper company profit margins from an average of ten to 12 percent to beyond 20 percent by the end of the century. The process was tough. Newspapers were laying off people and ending careers all through the good times of the ’90s, long before their primary advertising franchises became in doubt.

By the late ’90′s newspaper classifieds started to erode. First, recruitment spending went to the Web, as employers discovered they could do for themselves what the liner ads in the back of the paper had always done before. Next, department store spending bled away, as the big chain stores hit cost and competition walls. Later on, real estate discovered the Web as well, and that long-held franchise began to drift away.

In reality, all of these major components of newspaper advertising had been eroding for years. But in a hot economy, loss of share may not be noticed as long as receipts continue to climb — especially if you don’t measure share, just year-over-year change in sales. The strategy of increasing price where sales were good, then meeting with major advertisers to mediate the increase had always worked for newspapers. Everybody thought it would work forever. However, the strategy could only work in a world where no new media competitors — especially competitors that could compete in the classified arena — existed. Once the Internet was monetized, the old ways no longer applied.

Now, as the newspaper industry pulls itself back to black ink, it finds itself in a new world. Here are some of the new rules:

  • Content is still king (but not newswire content). Anybody with a computer or a smart phone can find 50 free sources for AP or Reuters content. They don’t need a newspaper (in any form) for that. On the other hand, Local news isn’t as commoditized. It tends to be scratched and suffered out of the community by actual reporters (or even by readers). It is the more valuable content for newspapers.
  • Ads are content, too. More than one-third of the people who use their computers or read a paper are employing those media to help them look for items to buy, things to do, or places to go. On Sundays, nearly half of the people who buy the newspaper are doing so for the advertising content.
  • Advertisers want measurement. They’re no longer satisfied being told that an ad will reach a lot of people – unless they can see the results in their places of business.

The last point is probably the most important. The marketing pendulum is swinging away from advertising, toward promotions. Unlike ads, promotions are very measurable, and they can be launched on an advertiser’s own website or Facebook page.

Can newspapers find a place in this new world, someplace between the pit and the pendulum? Some smaller papers, community and suburban offerings for the most part, continue to do well. It’s the big metro dailies that have been hit hardest and seem the slowest to recover. It is too soon to forecast how and in what form they will continue.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn