Borrell Associates, Inc

About Us

We help online media companies identify and increase their share of local online advertising revenue through fact-based research, proprietary data, consulting and comprehensive sales training

Sign Up

Posts Tagged ‘newspaper’

Groupon vs. newspaper? No contest!

Tuesday, January 25th, 2011

I tried a new restaurant in Fort Lauderdale thanks to a Groupon offer that I purchased last week, and in the process found out something fascinating about the restaurant’s experience.  It started with the mom of a Groupon executive, and ended with 431 people coming in the door … and the restaurant owner comparing the results to a coupon she advertised in the local newspaper.

Let’s start at the beginning.  When I got the offer this week for On The Menu Café,  I jumped on the deal. The restaurant had two things going for it:  It was two blocks from my favorite comic shop, and it served organic food (which I didn’t know until I read it in the offer).

When I spoke with the owner, she told me that a Groupon exec from Chicago was visiting his family in Fort Lauderdale when his mother suggested they visit the new restaurant.   He did, and thought the food was so good that he wanted to help the new business by sending a few hundred customers their way.  Groupon normally doesn’t take new restaurants.  The number of Groupon walk-ins can be overwhelming if the restaurant is not experienced enough to handle it.  The exec thought this particular restaurant could, and that the experience would be great for Groupon customers. (Having eaten there, I agree.  The food is exquisite.  It’s the kind of place you hope catches on so that you can keep returning.   I checked in on Facebook to help spread the word, too. )

I asked the owner about her experience with Groupon.  The deal was offered on Jan. 17th, and they sold 431 Groupons.  She said that they’ve already, in just one week, had a few people come back a second time.  Regarding the visits when a Groupon was redeemed, she said they hadn’t made or lost any money, and that she was very happy to know that 431 people would try her food, maybe more if you count the friends they bring along.

Here’s the clincher – and a bad one at that for the local newspaper, the Sun-Sentinel.  She compared her Groupon experience to the $1,000 she spent with the paper to put a Buy 1 Get 1 Free coupon in the Clipper.  She said four coupons were redeemed, costing her $250 per table served.

When I got home, I read an article about Groupon on Mashable.com in which founder Andrew Mason indicated that he thought Groupon knock-offs were having trouble reaching high quality advertisers when compared to Groupon.  I won’t argue with this.  I see Groupon as the Rolls-Royce of daily deals, but there’s a huge share of market that can be profitably captured in the local deals space when you compare the performance gap between a locally distributed coupon book to Groupon.  The urgency and scarcity associated with these daily deals, reinforced by a large e-mail database of deal seekers, make them very attractive to local publishers.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Those Who Forget the Past…

Monday, March 1st, 2010

Many of the online news services carried a headline recently, “Newspaper Local Web Sites Most Trusted Source for News.” The story behind the headline cited research recently completed for the Newspaper Association of America (NAA) by Comscore. Even though any self-promoting research must be viewed with skepticism, the Comscore results may well be valid. The problem is, it doesn’t matter. Unless the local papers can monetize their draw for news, they will still be shoved aside by other sites that can. Local newspaper sites that still depend on run-of-site static display for most of their online ad dollars will not see the increases in advertising that others who use search, targeted rich text, video and online direct will enjoy.

A long time ago (only 15 years, really … it just seems like longer now) newspaper research found another satisfying trend. The numbers seemed to show that when a person turned 35 or so, bought a home, and started to make a better than  average salary, he or she somehow morphed into a newspaper reader. It may seem laughable now, but it was an accepted industry fact back then. A few years later, research from Clark, Martine & Bartolomeo proved that this “fact” was absolutely wrong. The “Born to Read?” research showed that if readers were analyzed by year of birth instead of age, a very different picture emerged. Instead of some miraculous transformation, a generational change was occurring. Baby boomers read newspapers less than their parents, boomer’s kids read less yet, and so on. We now know their research was right. We see it every time newspaper circulation is measured.

Newspapers got on the Web early, but they weren’t very smart about monetizing their online presence. Instead, they offered many services (including news) for free. The theory was that these services would point users to the “core product,” i.e. the printed newspaper. Sadly, people who are used to getting something for free resist paying for it. Attempts to get money for online news have not been well-received. In the meantime, newspaper share of local online ad revenue has dropped by half during the last four years. So now newspapers have a conundrum: a trusted source of news that is hard to monetize. Rather than researching what they know and patting themselves on the back, they should be researching what they don’t know and figuring out what to do next.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn